[ Home | Archive 2001 | Archive 2002 | Archive 2003 | Archive Search ]
| Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]From: Josh
Date: 07 Jun 2001
Time: 20:25:51
Remote Name: 205.188.192.153
test.....test... 2 3 teas...
From: Horace
Date: 17 Apr 2001
Time: 04:19:07
Remote Name: 203.16.172.8
First of all let me say, I'm sorry to hear about the small penis.
Secondly, I have a bit of a problem with what appears to be your position on race.
First of all I do not understand how you can possibly conclude that race is simply a question of white and non-white. Have you discussed this delineation with, for example, the Japanese?
Secondly I do not understand how being white can be a matter of being accepted as white by the white people. What if their is disagreement? Are you white some of the time depending on who you are with or do all of the white people have to come together and vote on whether you are white? And anyway who is to say that they are white? (and therefore eligible to vote on your whiteness). Can you challenge the right of one of the so-called white people to categorize you?
Finally, you write, "There are no qualifications for being non white other than mistreatment at the hands of people who classiffy themselves as White(racism)". Does that mean that people who have "Pale skin, blue eyes, blonde hair and possibly, a small penis..." are actually non-white if they are mistreated "at the hands of people who classiffy themselves as White(racism)"? That means anyone beaten uup by a couple of white boys becomes non-white. I don't buy it.